Initial interest confusion: attempting to define its current status within European trade mark law

Alice Blythe

Back

Initial interest confusion: attempting to define its current status within European trade mark law

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Initial interest confusion: attempting to define its current status within European trade mark law

Alice Blythe

European Intellectual Property Review, Vol.38(11), pp.201-207

04/2016

Abstract

Law

Initial interest confusion is a controversial doctrine and has, until now, been largely resisted or ignored. Following Interflora v. Marks & Spencer (CAII) and OCH-Ziff Management v. OCH Capital it is necessary to ask whether it ought to be accepted within European trade mark law, and if so, where within the current framework it should sit.

Files and links (1)

pdf

Initial Interest Confusion Attempting to define its current status draft 4 for uploading to UBIR.pdfDownload View

Open Access

Metrics

24 File views/ downloads

59 Record Views

Details

Title: Initial interest confusion: attempting to define its current status within European trade mark law
Creators - without role: Alice Blythe
Publication Details: European Intellectual Property Review, Vol.38(11), pp.201-207
Publisher: Sweet and Maxwell
Format: text
Identifiers: 999682408841; 0142-0461
Academic Unit: Law
Language: English
Resource Type: Journal article
Comment: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in the European Intellectual Property Review following peer review. The definitive published version Alice Blythe, Initial Interest Confusion: Attempting to Define its Current Status Within European Trade Mark Law [2016] E.I.P.R. 201-207 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thompson Reuters DocDel service.

Initial interest confusion: attempting to define its current status within European trade mark law

Abstract

Files and links (1)

Metrics

Details

University of Greater Manchester Social media

Usage Policy