Logo image
European university students' mental health during Covid-19: Exploring attitudes towards Covid-19 and governmental response
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

European university students' mental health during Covid-19: Exploring attitudes towards Covid-19 and governmental response

Rosie Allen, Chathurika Kannangara, Mahimna Vyas and Jerome Carson
Current psychology, Vol.42(23), pp.20165-20178
08/2023

Abstract

Anxiety Psychological Distress Wellbeing university students Flourishing Covid-19 Psychology
The effects of Covid-19 have been felt worldwide and one population that are of increasing concern are university students. University students have endured unique and drastic changes to their everyday and academic lives. It is important to understand how university students in different parts of the world have been affected by the Covid-19 pandemic and how it has affected their mental health? A cross-sectional study was conducted during the first wave of Covid-19, in May 2020 with 2,006 university students from the UK, Italy, Germany and Spain. Participants were recruited online and were asked to complete a series of standardised measures of psychological distress, anxiety, flourishing and wellbeing. Attitudes towards Covid-19 were measured using a new scale. The factor structure and reliability of this new scale was confirmed using this European sample. Results indicated that all university students were suffering from poor mental health, considerably below pre-pandemic norms. There were many geographical differences in the way that university students perceived the Covid19 pandemic, in terms of their fears, anxieties, loneliness and positivity. There were also significant mental health comparisons between students from the UK, Italy, Germany and Spain. Student beliefs that their government had provided effective leadership during the Covid-19 pandemic were strongly related to numerous mental health outcomes. A picture of university students' mental health is provided and discussed. Geographical comparisons are discussed, as are the implications for practice and future directions.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12144-022-02854-0.
pdf
article.pdf743.45 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open Access In Copyright All Rights Reserved  — This item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation (such as any Fair Dealing allowances allowed by copyright law). For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
url
Link to Published VersionView
Published (Version of record) Publisher sites may require subscription to read content
url
Link to open access versionView
Accepted Open In Copyright All Rights Reserved  — This item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation (such as any Fair Dealing allowances allowed by copyright law). For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).

Metrics

298 File views/ downloads
25 Record Views
29 Times Cited - Scopus

Details

Logo image

Usage Policy