Abstract
Purpose -
This paper critically examines the distributed leadership literature, identifying its conceptual foundations, thematic developments, and research gaps. Synthesizing existing studies aims to advance theoretical and practical understandings of distributed leadership across diverse contexts.
Design/methodology/approach -
A rigorous three-step systematic literature review (SLR) process was employed to analyze 111 peer-reviewed studies published between 2002 and 2022. This approach integrates descriptive and thematic analyses to address key research questions on distributed leadership's conceptualization, thematic trends, and research gaps.
Findings -
The review highlights distributed leadership as a dynamic and context-dependent concept, emphasizing its social, collaborative, and performance-driven dimensions. Three primary themes emerged: behavioral perspectives, contextual influences, and performance implications. Gaps were identified in empirical, theoretical, population, and methodological domains. These include insufficient research in noneducational sectors, limited exploration of distributed leadership's applicability in developing nations, and the need for empirically validated frameworks and qualitative methodologies.
Originality/value -
This review is among the first to systematically map distributed leadership's evolution across multiple contexts using an SLR approach. It provides a robust synthesis of the field, offering a validated baseline for future research. The study's methodological rigor and its focus on underexplored areas contribute significantly to advancing the discourse on distributed leadership.