Logo image
Attempting to define an unfair advantage: an evaluation of the current law in light of the recent European decisions
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Attempting to define an unfair advantage: an evaluation of the current law in light of the recent European decisions

Alice Blythe
European Intellectual Property Review, Vol.34(11), pp.754-761
11/2012

Abstract

Law
Subject: Intellectual property, trade mark infringement, keyword advertising, unfair advantage, dilution, trade mark use. Cases Interflora Inc. v. Marks & Spencer plc. Flowers Direct Online Limited (C-323/09) - Google France Sarl v. Louis Vuitton Malletier SA (C-236/08) - L’Oreal SA v. Bellure NV (C-486/07) Following the recent ECJ preliminary rulings in Interflora v. Marks & Spencer and Google France v. Louis Vuittion concerning keyword advertising the key issues of unfair advantage, trade mark use and parallel application of Article 5(1)(a) and 5(2) Directive 89/104/EEC have been re examined. It is necessary to examine these latter cases in relation to the impact that L’Oreal v. Bellure has had on the definition of what constitutes an unfair advantage.
pdf
Unfair advantage EIPR draft FINAL for uploading to UBIR.pdfDownloadView
Open Access

Metrics

64 File views/ downloads
60 Record Views

Details

Logo image

Usage Policy