Logo image
Aristotle, Montaigne, Kant and the others : How friendship came to be conceived as it is conceived in the Western tradition
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Aristotle, Montaigne, Kant and the others : How friendship came to be conceived as it is conceived in the Western tradition

Suzanne Stern-Gillet
International Journal of Technoethics, Vol.10(1), pp.49-61
01/2019

Abstract

Affection Aristotle Care Choice Christianity Derrida Eudaimonia Friendship Greece Kant Kierkegaard Loyalty Montaigne Particularism Pleasure Rome Universalism Utility Philosophy Social Sciences
Concepts of inter-personal relations are most elusive. They conceal assumptions, norms, beliefs and various associated notions, and become even more opaque and potent when they transcend the language in which they are used and come to reflect a culture or a tradition. Escaping the critical gaze of those “in” the tradition, these concepts and their theoretical baggage remain largely alien to those outside it. This gap fosters a sense of alienation, if not of exclusion, on the part of those living outside what they often regard as a charmed circle. No doubt, friendship is unlikely to figure on the danger list of such concepts. Yet, the concept is not innocent. It reflects philosophical and social presuppositions accumulated in the course of its long history and bears the weight of the paradigm shifts it underwent. This essay identifies some of these presuppositions built into it, outlines major steps in its development, and offers reasons why this particulate inter-personal relation came to be conceived the way it is conceived in “the Western tradition”.
pdf
Stern-Gillett Aristotle-Montaigne-Kant-and-the-Othersf.pdfDownloadView
Published (Version of record) Open Access
url
Link to Published VersionView
Published (Version of record)Publisher sites may require subscription to read content

Metrics

35 File views/ downloads
32 Record Views

Details

Logo image

Usage Policy